Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Does this scare anyone else?

I am going to take a page from Paige and ask, DOES IT SCARE ANYONE ELSE THAT THIS LADY IS SUPPOSEDLY 5 MONTHS PREGNANT?

I don't know about you, but I am thinking, WHAT BABY?

17 comments:

♥Shally said...

I bet my face weight more at 5 months pregnant than her whole body...

Anne said...

Um, yeah. I NEVER look like that, let alone 5 months pregnant!

Jake said...

I know. She's not THAT tall.

Christie said...

There is no way a baby is hiding anywhere near her body. Unless she shoved it under all that botox. That might be where it is. Hmmm.

jessica said...

It's insane! Unless the realy Nicole is at home as big as a house and that is just a robot...Stepford Wives anyone...

Did you hear my happy song and dance last night around 11pm...? I was celebrating that Marshona is FINALLY gone!

BTW...I could read your last blog but not leave a comment, I just wanted to say hang in there. You are amazing. Remember that the Lord knows when to pick up your slack...and He does a great job!

Jessica said...

I'm glad to see that Keith is the only one devoted to the tanning bed, currently, as UV Rays, along with Botox, are probably not so good for the fetus.

Which is why I'm abstaining from both, as well.

Not quite the Bradys said...

What? I don't get it. What do you mean? I ALWAYS look like that when I'm pregnant....


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Time to check the carbon monoxide detector again.

Bridget said...

Very scary indeed. THat's some serious "control top" if you ask me.

calibosmom said...

Ok, when I first looked at this picture before reading anything, I thought it was going to be about Madam Trousseau's Wax Museum. THEY LOOK LIKE THEY ARE MADE OUT OF WAX! Creepy! Unless she is carrying that baby in her forehead, she is not preggers!

abbyandcompany said...

oh my look at all these haters! Botox and wax and tanning beds, oh my! The poor girl probably carries her pregnancy different since she started a total rail. I doubt she would injure her baby since she has wanted a biological child for quite a long time now.

And yes, she is THAT tall (5'11)

Anonymous said...

I agree with abbbandcompany....come on...lets think about this. 5 months is only 20 weeks. I didn't start showing until I was 24 weeks with my first baby. No one could even tell...and I am short. It is her first baby so it is probably pretty normal to not show at 20 weeks. Plus, she is really tall so she as more places for that baby to go.

JBelle said...

hey! Is this blog open to mothers who don't have kids in diapers or a Stake? 'Cause I'd like to come around, but only if it's okay. :)

Lindsey said...

Ok people, come on... lets not get testy... It is all in good fun, and plus, we are all just really jealous... I AM 6'2... I had PLENTY Of places to HIDE a baby... and I never looked like that...

JBelle said...

Well. I have recipes. I have children. I have a church, too. I think I can get the gist of the whole thing if people are patient with me. ;)

Not quite the Bradys said...

I don't know about this whole "tall people got more places to hide babies" thing. You do know we still got internal organs, right?

Celia Fae said...

She's not really pregnant. It's a lie. She has a surrogate or something. That, or she's been doing Shally's ab routine.

I'm still obsessed with the cupcake post. I didn't know there was such variety! I'm going to have to look around for a shop around here. I can't stand how good they look.

Ilene said...

Why do Anonymous comments always "hate" on everyone else? It is a general rule I find across the blogging board.

It looks like Nicole has watched lots of What Not to Wear. Rouching (sp?- the fabric gathering technique) is recommended for those of us with bellies. So, I say give credit to the rouching because it makes me feel better than to actually give credit to her tall gorgeous body.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails